On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 05:03:49PM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:

 > I don't want to encourage an `abuse' of `BEFORE' entries; the `BEFORE'
 > support was primarily added for third party scripts which may be
 > installed into the system where you don't want to have to modify the
 > existing scripts to change the dependency ordering.

While that may be true, it seems like a perfect thing to use for this
type of situation.  Everything that requires securelevel 0 should run
"BEFORE securelevel" is changed...

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>