>| 1.113:
>| be more cautious about tcp option length field.  drop bogus ones earlier.
>| not sure if there is a real threat or not, but it seems that there's
>| possibility for overrun/underrun (like non-NOP option with optlen > cnt).
>it seems to me that this whole section of tcp_dooptions() should increment
>a counter (e.g. "with bad options"). Agreement?

	do you mean adding a new option?

itojun