Are these workaround being documented (other than in the CVS logs
	:), so they can be revisited when gcc is updated?

	Are we sending bug reports back to gcc about things like this?


		David/absolute
				       -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --

On Wed, 31 May 2000, Dan McMahill wrote:

> 
> Module Name:	pkgsrc
> Committed By:	dmcmahill
> Date:		Wed May 31 14:51:17 UTC 2000
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/files: patch-sum
> 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches: patch-ai
> Added Files:
> 	pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches: patch-aj patch-ak patch-al
> 
> Log Message:
> work around pmax compiler bug (c++ -O2) by not using -O2 on the remaining
> 3 problem files when compiling on pmax.
> 
> 
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -r1.5 -r1.6 pkgsrc/audio/festival/files/patch-sum
> cvs rdiff -r1.1 -r1.2 pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-ai
> cvs rdiff -r0 -r1.1 pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-aj \
>     pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-ak \
>     pkgsrc/audio/festival/patches/patch-al
> 
> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> copyright notices on the relevant files.
> 
>