On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Alistair G. Crooks wrote:
> > At least mysql still contains fuzz (and a couple of other problems :)
> 
> The person who is fixing mysql asked me to commit this change, to
> make it easier to work out which diffs need to be applied. The
> double invocation of patch(1) was just getting in the way. Indeed,
> the double invocation was only meant as a temporary measure until
> the majority of fuzz was removed from the tree. That time has come.
> 
> I haven't the faintest idea why you want it retained.

I don't, never did. If I would, I'd say so.
I just wanted to provide a bit of data. It's mit-pthreads too, btw.


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra