-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Matt Thomas wrote:

>Log Message:
>rename ibcs2_sysi86 to ibcs2_sysmachine (since ibcs2 now runs on other
>things than i386).

Shouldn't the ibcs2 part of this name change as well?  If I understand
correctly, IBCS == _Intel_ Binary Compatibility Standard, rev. 2, and is
a standard ABI for SVRx on Intel.  Thus, if this is to be generalized to
more architectures, perhaps this should be svrx_sysmachine...  (where on
i386 it would in fact be an implementation of the IBCS2)?

Or am I missing something (very possible)?  My main interest stems from
a back-burner desire to get A/UX (svr2) emulation on mac68k at least
partially working, now that we have some MI COFF goo, and that is
probably able to benefit from this code, but is certainly not IBCS...

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBOHlgZy2NgFbJL33VEQJiDgCeJy+Q/CrgtdqWXua0XW2PVjVoDxsAoMkv
yU6RhqL1eqsexlgmUwHXgBaN
=aEX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----