Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

re: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)

To: Simon Burge <simonb%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: re: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
From: matthew green <mrg%towers-of-dub.eterna.com.au@localhost>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 16:10:34 +1000



'cvs import' is significantly kinder on my +inbox...  espcially with
20 messages containing the relatively useless info that a new directory
has been created...  IIRC, this is why pkgs are imported.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
  - From: itojun

References:
- "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
  - From: Simon Burge

Prev by Date: CVS commit: basesrc
Next by Date: Re: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
Previous by Thread: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
Next by Thread: Re: "cvs import" vs. "cvs add" (was Re: CVS commit: syssrc)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index