Subject: Re: CVS commit: syssrc
To: None <itojun@netbsd.org, simonb@netbsd.org>
From: Ross Harvey <ross@teraflop.com>
List: source-changes
Date: 09/14/1999 17:04:03
> From source-changes-owner@netbsd.org Tue Sep 14 16:01:44 1999
> From: Simon Burge <simonb@netbsd.org>
> To: itojun@netbsd.org
> Cc: source-changes@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: CVS commit: syssrc 
> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 08:58:07 +1000
>
> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
>
> > Module Name:	syssrc
> > Committed By:	itojun
> > Date:		Mon Sep 13 10:31:44 UTC 1999
> > 
> > [[ the new sh3 files ]]
>
> Out of idle curiosity, would it have been better/easier/cleaner to
> "cvs import" the sh3 stuff (or any other large collection of files)
> rather than "cvs add" them?
>
> Simon.
>

I would say "no". This isn't an import on a vendor branch, and it
certainly isn't easier, cvs import is an awkward command. But mainly,
isn't NetBSD the vendor here? :-)