Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org> writes:

> Personally, I don't care if it is codafs or coda, just so long as the
> in-kernel name (for dynamic loading, if/when that is possible for
modules will happen someday.  I've never been too excited about this
because I lose symbols for debugging.

> Coda) matches the mount -t argument.
I'm not sure mount -t will ever happen.  There is this HUGE "client"
side daemon that needs to be run.  A client of the fs does fs ops in
/coda and they get passed queued for the venus daemon to read, process
and then write answers to.  (The client does a mount internally:
	mount("coda", ...)