Source-Changes archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: sun-lamp CVS commits



[ On Fri, October  6, 1995 at 13:28:45 (+1000), Simon J. Gerraty wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: sun-lamp CVS commits 
>
> I'd personally prefer to see unix defined though I can see that
> lawyers and other such types might be a problem.  

I don't think the lawyers will care about this unless someone gives a
directive to them to stomp out all "free" unix-like OS's [which would be
insane anyway, as it would only hurt a commercial vendor even if you
ignored the bad politics it would cause].  In such a case they might use
such internal similarties as a lever.

This is why I mentioned POSIX.  It *should* have been something they
delt with....

> Most such breakage though could be fixed by adding -Dunix to sys.mk 

Yes, in fact if done in the right place it might even be transparent to
the current implementation (assuming one uses the default make rules,
which would also be a very silly assumption to ``make'').  [sorry!]

-- 
                                                        Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734                 VE3TCP                  robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods%planix.com@localhost>; Secrets Of The Weird 
<woods%weird.com@localhost>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index