Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1 tests/lint: document why accidenta...
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/6b5405510356
branches: trunk
changeset: 359671:6b5405510356
user: rillig <rillig%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Sun Jan 16 10:11:38 2022 +0000
description:
tests/lint: document why accidental double semicolons are hard to detect
diffstat:
tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.exp | 2 +-
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diffs (46 lines):
diff -r c0703d104cab -r 6b5405510356 tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.c
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.c Sun Jan 16 09:41:28 2022 +0000
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.c Sun Jan 16 10:11:38 2022 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: msg_193.c,v 1.16 2022/01/15 23:21:34 rillig Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: msg_193.c,v 1.17 2022/01/16 10:11:38 rillig Exp $ */
# 3 "msg_193.c"
// Test for message: statement not reached [193]
@@ -672,6 +672,27 @@
;;
/*
+ * If assertions are disabled with -DNDEBUG and __lint__ is defined,
+ * NetBSD's <assert.h> defines assert(x) to nothing, leaving only
+ * the trailing semicolon. If there are several assertions next to
+ * each other, without any whitespace in between (very unusual), the
+ * GCC preprocessor generates ";;" for them, which makes them
+ * indistinguishable from the literal ";;" from the typo above.
+ *
+ * (echo '#include <assert.h>'; echo 'assert(0);assert(1);') \
+ * | gcc -DNDEBUG -E - -D__lint__
+ *
+ * To actually see the difference, lint would need to look at the
+ * code before preprocessing and compare it with the preprocessed
+ * code, which would be a lot of work.
+ *
+ * Apart from the above edge case, detecting extra semicolons would
+ * be possible, but lint would have to look at the whitespace between
+ * the tokens, and this is something that it doesn't do at all, as of
+ * 2022-01-16.
+ */
+
+ /*
* A stand-alone null statement, on the other hand, has its purpose.
* Without it, the 'for' loop would not be complete. The NetBSD
* style is to use 'continue;' instead of a simple ';'.
diff -r c0703d104cab -r 6b5405510356 tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.exp
--- a/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.exp Sun Jan 16 09:41:28 2022 +0000
+++ b/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_193.exp Sun Jan 16 10:11:38 2022 +0000
@@ -87,4 +87,4 @@
msg_193.c(606): warning: statement not reached [193]
msg_193.c(627): warning: statement not reached [193]
msg_193.c(655): warning: statement not reached [193]
-msg_193.c(683): warning: statement not reached [193]
+msg_193.c(704): warning: statement not reached [193]
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index