Source-Changes-HG archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
[src/trunk]: src/sys/dev/pci Use BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE only if BAR and d...
details: https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/34e1aece0510
branches: trunk
changeset: 846818:34e1aece0510
user: riastradh <riastradh%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date: Mon Dec 02 08:33:42 2019 +0000
description:
Use BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE only if BAR and driver agree on it.
- A driver that expects prefetchable memory and knows to issue the
needed bus_space_barrier calls can pass BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE
to indicate a desire to map the memory prefetchable if the BAR
allows it.
(A driver that _really wants_ BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE even if
the BAR claims _not_ to be prefetchable can use pci_mapreg_info and
bus_space_map explicitly -- this is not different from what we have
today.)
- For a driver that _does not_ expect prefetchable memory, the
appearance of the prefetchable bit in the BAR shouldn't cause it to
use BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE, because the driver will not issue
the needed bus_space_barrier calls to get sensible results.
Note: `Prefetchable' here, sometimes called `write-combining', means
reads have no side effects, and writes are idempotent, so it is safe
to issue reads out of order and safe to combine writes.
Mappings with BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE are often more weakly
ordered than normal memory -- e.g., on x86, in WC-type memory
regions, loads can be reordered with loads, stores can be reordered
with stores, which is not possible with any other type of memory
regions.
Discussed on tech-kern a while ago:
https://mail-index.NetBSD.org/tech-kern/2017/03/22/msg021678.html
This is option A, which received the most support. This should help
unconfuse drivers that do not expect prefetchable mappings, like
Yamaguchi-san tripped over recently:
https://mail-index.NetBSD.org/tech-kern/2019/12/02/msg025785.html
diffstat:
sys/dev/pci/pci_map.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diffs (45 lines):
diff -r b22b50d6d291 -r 34e1aece0510 sys/dev/pci/pci_map.c
--- a/sys/dev/pci/pci_map.c Mon Dec 02 03:06:51 2019 +0000
+++ b/sys/dev/pci/pci_map.c Mon Dec 02 08:33:42 2019 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $NetBSD: pci_map.c,v 1.37 2019/03/01 05:41:56 msaitoh Exp $ */
+/* $NetBSD: pci_map.c,v 1.38 2019/12/02 08:33:42 riastradh Exp $ */
/*-
* Copyright (c) 1998, 2000 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
*/
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
-__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: pci_map.c,v 1.37 2019/03/01 05:41:56 msaitoh Exp $");
+__KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: pci_map.c,v 1.38 2019/12/02 08:33:42 riastradh Exp $");
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/systm.h>
@@ -328,7 +328,25 @@
if (realmaxsize < (offset + reqsize))
return 1;
- if (bus_space_map(tag, base, reqsize, busflags | flags, &handle))
+ /*
+ * If the BAR doesn't say prefetchable, assume the mapping
+ * cannot be prefetchable. In other words, we will use
+ * BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE only if the driver requested it
+ * _and_ the BAR indicates it is prefetchable.
+ *
+ * Drivers that expect prefetchable memory will issue the
+ * appropriate barriers, whereas drivers that do not expect
+ * prefetchable memory will be terribly confused if the memory
+ * is mapped prefetchable.
+ *
+ * Drivers that want to override the BAR and map it with
+ * BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE anyway can use pci_mapreg_map and
+ * bus_space_map explicitly.
+ */
+ if (!ISSET(flags, BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE))
+ busflags &= ~BUS_SPACE_MAP_PREFETCHABLE;
+
+ if (bus_space_map(tag, base, reqsize, busflags, &handle))
return 1;
if (pci_mapreg_map_enable_decode) {
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index