Source-Changes-HG archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

[src/trunk]: src/sys/sys Add a rather long comment explaining what has happen...



details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/a5671f2429a7
branches:  trunk
changeset: 846275:a5671f2429a7
user:      christos <christos%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Sat Nov 09 16:40:38 2019 +0000

description:
Add a rather long comment explaining what has happened with disklabel and
why.

diffstat:

 sys/sys/disklabel.h |  36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diffs (50 lines):

diff -r 4d3af13641a3 -r a5671f2429a7 sys/sys/disklabel.h
--- a/sys/sys/disklabel.h       Sat Nov 09 12:54:34 2019 +0000
+++ b/sys/sys/disklabel.h       Sat Nov 09 16:40:38 2019 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/*     $NetBSD: disklabel.h,v 1.120 2018/11/06 04:04:34 mrg Exp $      */
+/*     $NetBSD: disklabel.h,v 1.121 2019/11/09 16:40:38 christos Exp $ */
 
 /*
  * Copyright (c) 1987, 1988, 1993
@@ -116,6 +116,40 @@
 #define        p_cpg   __partition_u1.cpg
 #define        p_sgs   __partition_u1.sgs
 };
+
+/*
+ * We'd rather have disklabel be the same size on 32 and 64 bit systems
+ * but it really isn't. In revision 108 matt@ tried to do that by adding
+ * un_d_pad as a uint64_t. This was really smart because the net effect
+ * as to grow the struct by 4 bytes on most LP32 machines and make it
+ * the same as LP64 without changing the layout (which is a nono because
+ * it is stored on existing disks). The easy way would have been to add
+ * padding at the end, but that would have been confusing (although that
+ * is what actually happens), because the partitions structure is supposed
+ * to be variable size and putting a padding uint32_t would be weird.
+ * Unfornately mips32 and i386 align uint64_t standalone at an 8 byte
+ * boundary, but in structures at a 4 byte boundary so matt's
+ * change did not affect them.
+ *
+ * We also prefer to have the structure 4 byte aligned so that the
+ * subr_disk_mbr.c code that scans for label does not trigger ubsan
+ * when comparing magic (without making the code ugly). To do this
+ * we can unexpose the d_boot{0,1} pointers in the kernel (so that
+ * LP64 systems can become 4 byte aligned) and at the same time
+ * remove the un_d_pad member and add padding at the end. The d_boot{0,1}
+ * fields are only used in userland in getdiskbyname(3), filled with
+ * the names of the primary and secondary bootstrap from /etc/disktab.
+ *
+ * While this is a way forward, it is not clear that it is the best
+ * way forward. The ubsan warning is incorrect and the code
+ * will always work since d_magic is always 4 byte aligned even
+ * when structure disklabel is not 8 byte aligned, so what we do
+ * now is ignore it. Another way would be to do offset arithmetic
+ * on the pointer and use it as a char *. That would not prevent
+ * other misaligned accesses in the future. Finally one could
+ * copy the unaligned structure to an aligned one, but that eats
+ * up space on the stack.
+ */
 struct disklabel {
        uint32_t d_magic;               /* the magic number */
        uint16_t d_type;                /* drive type */



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index