Source-Changes-HG archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

[src/netbsd-1-6]: src/doc Pullup of tickets 1367, 1369, 1371 and 1415.



details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/src/rev/891ec17f0d8d
branches:  netbsd-1-6
changeset: 530579:891ec17f0d8d
user:      tron <tron%NetBSD.org@localhost>
date:      Sat Aug 16 16:19:15 2003 +0000

description:
Pullup of tickets 1367, 1369, 1371 and 1415.

diffstat:

 doc/CHANGES-1.6.2 |  30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diffs (41 lines):

diff -r 02bdc8142834 -r 891ec17f0d8d doc/CHANGES-1.6.2
--- a/doc/CHANGES-1.6.2 Sat Aug 16 16:17:11 2003 +0000
+++ b/doc/CHANGES-1.6.2 Sat Aug 16 16:19:15 2003 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-1.6.2,v 1.1.2.111 2003/08/15 19:34:06 tron Exp $
+#      $NetBSD: CHANGES-1.6.2,v 1.1.2.112 2003/08/16 16:19:15 tron Exp $
 
 A complete list of changes from NetBSD 1.6.1 to NetBSD 1.6.2:
 
@@ -1245,3 +1245,31 @@
        the first 128GB). Tested by Andreas Johansson.
        [bouyer, ticket #1370]
 
+sys/dev/pci/pciide.c                           1.193 via patch
+
+       Add support for ICH5, from Quentin Garnier in private mail.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1367]
+
+sys/dev/pci/pciide.c                           1.194
+sys/dev/pci/pciide_pdc202xx_reg.h              1.10
+
+       Correct setup of General Purpose Register for PDC20265 (Ultra/100) and
+       newer. From Andreas Johansson in private mail.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1369]
+
+distrib/notes/i386/hardware                    1.112 via patch
+share/man/man4/pciide.4                                1.49 via patch
+
+       Note ICH5 support.
+       [bouyer, ticket #1371]
+
+sys/arch/i386/i386/machdep.c                   1.529
+
+       Fix stack location for VM86 processes in the !sigaltstack case.
+       I doubt it makes much sense to use the VM's stack for this, but the
+       old code was doubtless wrong because it potentially overwrote random
+       user memory.
+       (It might be a good idea to use the process' pre-vm86()-call stack,
+       but atm the infrastructure for this is missing.)
+       [drochner, ticket #1415]
+



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index