Of course some differences are expected. But some seem surprising: -agp0 at pchb0: G4X-family chipset -agp0: detected 32252k stolen memory -agp0: aperture at 0xd0000000, size 0x10000000 -i915drmkms0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: Intel 82G45 Integrated Graphics Device (rev. 0x03) -Intel product 2e23 (miscellaneous display, revision 0x03) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured +agp at pchb0 not configured +vga0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0: vendor 8086 product 2e22 (rev. 0x03) +wsdisplay0 at vga0 kbdmux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) +wsmux1: connecting to wsdisplay0 +drm at vga0 not configured +vendor 8086 product 2e23 (miscellaneous display, revision 0x03) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured Also, even when things are found they print differently: -ahcisata0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2: Intel 82801JI SATA Controller (AHCI mode) (rev. 0x00) +ahcisata0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2: vendor 8086 product 3a22 (rev. 0x00) So, is it a goal that XEN3_DOM0 should in general aupport all drivers in GENERIC, in the sense that absent a good reason for DOM0 to differ, the same hardware is found? Or is there an articulated plan for differences? Perhaps put another way, if I were to fix this by making XEN3_DOM0 more like GENERIC, would that upset anyone?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature