Re: xvifX.Y vs sysctl_create() returning 22 (EINVAL)

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> I thought more about "branching date" (rather than delay), eg. just
> before 6.0 is branched. The scripts being part of etc, they are not
> replaced by pkgsrc automatically,

they are if they were not modified locally. For most installations,
updating the package will get the new script in place.

> and making the syntax sugar change
> in the middle of 5.99 is not the kind of things appreciated by
> users.

It's -current, I don't see this as a problem, as long as the
appropriate scripts are in a pkgsrc stable branch.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--