On Fri, Sep 08 2006 - 19:42, Quentin Garnier wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Joel CARNAT wrote: > > I have to triple-check (google give YES and NO answers) but it seems > > my Dell D620 has VT-enabled (with a CoreDuo T2300). > > Well, there are two versions of the CoreDuo T2300; the T2300E doesn't > support VT. We should probably print the flag in dmesg but it will add > silliness to an already overloaded identcpu.c... > yeah, I read about the T2300E. mince is: cpu0: Intel Pentium M (Yonah) (686-class), 1664.54 MHz, id 0x6e8 cpu0: "Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz" but as you said, that does not give a clue about this. > > Does NetBSD/xen3 already supports virtualization via VT-enabled chip ? > > I don't think so. I've intended to try for a while, but haven't > found the time yet. I do know, however, that NetBSD doesn't run in > a HVM domU (blame it on the qemu backend). > well, my idea was NetBSD as dom0 and Windows as domU. maybe some Linux and Solaris domU too from time to time. > > If not, which place does this feature have in to xen3 TODO list ? > > That depends if anyone is working on it. You can always try and donate > a VT (or SVM which is the AMD counterpart)-enabled system to Manuel with > hope it could speed up the process :-) > hehe... 'gotta ask my boss if I can give my working laptop to the NetBSD project... the answer probably will be 2 letters long and begin with a N :)
Attachment:
pgpZfOxBDNrFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature