Subject: Re: Xen3 update
To: Jed Davis <jdev@panix.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: port-xen
Date: 03/08/2006 14:11:00
--mlxBsilMljZ1v4XL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:58:47PM -0500, Jed Davis wrote:
> Despite that I dislike having INSECURE in any default config:
> What about a XENU that's been given access to physical devices?

That would be a custom kernel anyway, and thus could have INSECURE
added again if needed.

Please, lets leave INSECURE out of XENU.

--
Dan.
--mlxBsilMljZ1v4XL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEDktEEAVxvV4N66cRApleAJ91WYunhVcGD6xZECVUsDFQVaaPbACg2Bt0
Glu1WNIeSg5eQESvMwRenF0=
=X+va
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mlxBsilMljZ1v4XL--