Subject: Re: ok to bump vnd to 32 in XEN0 config?
To: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: port-xen
Date: 01/31/2006 11:24:01
--58yjuNbz5lCTNNJH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:16:13AM +0100, Juan RP wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:26:38 +1100
> Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au> wrote:
>=20
> > How hard would it be to make these cloning-type devices, created on
> > demand?  (the devices, not the /dev nodes, that's another bikeshed :)
>=20
> Do you mean a device clonning as was implemented for bpf(4) or tap(4)
> or are you talking about something else?

Yes, just like that, though perhaps a closer implementation analogue
would be the way that sd(4) instances or wedges can come and go
dynamically, just because its disks and not network devices.

--
Dan.
--58yjuNbz5lCTNNJH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFD3q4hEAVxvV4N66cRArk8AKD2CH6lYPPffxBtHICK1OQ/L7kWeACeIjt5
P9u4I30sQhipUgNSZWDP8ak=
=8bLg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--58yjuNbz5lCTNNJH--