Port-vax archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Issues with compiler failures
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 09:33:44AM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 17, 2019, at 3:07 AM, Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 04:43:45AM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> >> Both are these failures are in reload specific code.
> >> "Reload is the GCC equivalent of Satan." - GCC wiki
> >> The best way moving forward would be to adapt the GCC VAX port to not
> >> use reload.
> >
> > Or accept the fact that there is no active gcc maintainer upstream and
> > everyone who has interest in VAX is not willing to spend enough time on
> > gcc.
>
> Is there no one willing to take on the gcc maintainer role for vax? It's not rocket science.
>
> paul
>
>
Will you be able to mentor? :-)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index