Subject: Re: Compiling fast on a VAX?
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Lord Isildur <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/26/2007 15:34:27
brain and mouth/fingers were not reading from the same page. yes.
simpler terms: old csrg libc is fast&loose compared to the libc we use
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:26:18 -0700
> From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
> To: Lord Isildur <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com>, port-vax@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Compiling fast on a VAX?
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Lord Isildur wrote:
>> when it came to protections and checking)- this had thrown off results from
>> benchmarking a lot of programs, because gcc's optimization wasnt always
>> better enough to overcome the slowness in gnu libc.
> Uh... NetBSD doesn't use GNU libc.
> -- thorpej