On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Johnny Billquist wrote:

>> 2) Matt, have you looked at why the built-in finite() in gcc always expands 
>> to false for the VAX? (This is the reason top and so on gives illegal 
>> instruction).
>
> Looking at the commits to gcc in the last few days, this really looks like it 
> has been fixed. I'll report after the rebuild if it indeed is.

   It has been fixed.  I spotted the problem, and from Matt's commit 
message, it looked like there was probably a fix already for it.

   I also made the fix on my 4.0_BETA2 tree, and did an upgrade to 
4.0_BETA2 and verified that it will fix the problem there as well.  I'm 
going to submit a pullup request for that, hopefully today.

--
Michael L. Hitch			mhitch@montana.edu
Computer Consultant
Information Technology Center
Montana State University	Bozeman, MT	USA