--nextPart1538309.ZjLx30nFE1
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Just out of interest, giving the previous list conversations, am I right in=
=20
assuming that VAX package porting (source -> binary) is not 'owned' by an=20
individual?

Is there any active work being done on the VAX port (other than Blaz's=20
stirling efforts)? Are the rumours about VAX support in gcc being dropped i=
n=20
current developments true?

Just curious,

Mark
=2D-=20
Mark Wickens, Software Consultant, Valtech UK Ltd
Watch/CIB IT Support Team (EDS), DWP Lytham St Annes
Tel: 01253 334465 x64465 Mob: 07917 653012/07780 806787
Email: mark.wickens@valtech.co.uk

--nextPart1538309.ZjLx30nFE1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDhE0XrKRs2XB2IEMRAv7pAJ4wVC5L2wvOT+P8iSCUgkESpV65oACfToET
CSwsA4ErmR19YnZEWFY/s70=
=w5BW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1538309.ZjLx30nFE1--