Subject: Re: current on vax, problems
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se>
From: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
List: port-vax
Date: 11/20/2003 08:22:17
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:37:07PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 ragge@ludd.luth.se wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > This is the texinfo error that I mentioned. Ragge claims he checked in a
> > > few a few weeks ago. If this is from a fresh -current, then Ragge must
> > > have missed it.
> > >
> > No, but the _installed_ cpp must be recompiled and replaced with a
> > fixed one. Libintl uses some gcc-special tricks when compiling the tools.
>
> Aha! You found the problem in gcc (or did you do a real hack to fix it)?
> Good news anyway. That means you fixed it the proper way instead of my
> hacks...
Am I being stupid, or shouldn't the tools be buildable with any (reasonable)
C compiler? So requiring gcc for a tool is a no-no ?
David
--
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk