Robertdkeys@aol.com wrote:
> I am not proposing it be eol'd.  But, there are beginning to
> be some limitations popping up, e.g., ram size, gcc hogishness,
> and that kind of thing.  If those don't turn out to be problems,
> then VAX forever!.....(:+}}....
> 
> The year 2032 was a joke thingy.....(:+}}...
> 
> As always, kudos to you for your efforts in the VAX world!
> 

Future gcc support may not be such a problem, as I just had a poke
through the PDP10 mailing list. It appears that ragge recently updated
pcc to handle ANSI C, and no doubt someone would update pcc for the Vax
port if they ever felt the need.

Chris
-- 
chris.wareham@iosystems.co.uk (work)
chris.wareham@btopenworld.com (home)