Subject: Re: largest disk in a vs4000/90
To: None <>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: port-vax
Date: 07/19/2003 01:03:35
> my i386 disk is like
> rock% df
> Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used     Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a      655959    55362    567799     8%    /
> /dev/wd0e    54908827 15478174  36685211    29%    /usr

> I would not consider a large boot area a requirement.  Is is?

Well, as I said, for i386 I understand the issues much less.  I just
know I had a machine which wouldn't work with a single big (ca. 6G)
partition but which worked with a small boot partition and a big root

> The vaxen net boot off a large disk.  Might a diskless one have an
> issue?

No, as far as I know none of these issues apply to diskless machines in
any form.  They apply, if anywhere, on the machine to which the disk is
directly connected.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B