Hello again from Gregg C Levine
Every time I examine that list, I don't see any machines that are 655
based, which happens to be MicroVax based. And I get it to boot under
SIMH-VAX. But in this business I keep an open mind. So the question is
still the same. What models are not supported is a good question, and
one that should be posted to the original developers, which probably
are on this list.
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofalcon@worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."=A0 Obi-Wan Kenobi
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to General Obi-Wan Kenobi )
(This company dedicates this E-Mail to Master Yoda )



> -----Original Message-----
> From: port-vax-owner@netbsd.org [mailto:port-vax-owner@netbsd.org]
On Behalf
> Of Thomas Dzubin
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: port-vax@netbsd.org
> Subject: What models of VAX are *NOT* supported by NetBSD?
>=20
>=20
> (Subject change)
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 Robertdkeys@aol.com wrote:
> > Chuck.... you bring up an interesting issue.... i.e., a user
> > VAX compiler.  Since, for the sake of discussion, the VAX
> > is basically a closed ended system, now, with no new
> > machines being made,   I would think it would be prudent
>=20
> I know the main http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/vax/ web page lists
> all of the VAX models that ARE supported.  My question is:
> what models are NOT supported?  Any big (in production numbers,
> not physical size :-) ones missing?
> The only main one I don't see on the list is the MicroVAX I
>=20
>=20
> Thomas Dzubin
> Calgary, Vancouver, or Saskatoon CANADA