John Klos wrote:

> That, I am guessing, is a different problem. Softdeps yes/no was asked
> about corruption of > 4 gig slices in 1.6; it happened the same no matter.
> Softdeps are fixed in 1.6, apparently, as many people get heavy use out of
> systems with softdeps without corruption.
> 
> The issue is whether 1.5.2 or, perhaps, 1.5.3 even, can handle > 4 gig
> slices without eventual corruption.

Ah, ok.. I'm still running 1.5.1 on the machine in question and after I 
switched off softdeps I've never had a fs-related panic again (the 
partition in question is 4.3 gigs in size).

-- 
Matthias Buelow