On June 18, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
>  > we really should do sufficient adaptation to pcc to a: free it from the 
>  > license, b: make the optimizer as good as gcc's, and c: dig ANSI C as 
>  > well as K&R. 
> 
> That would be wasted effort.  Are you going to add C++ to PCC?  Are you
> going to add Fortran to PCC?  Are you going to make PCC emit debug info
> that modern debuggers like to use?

  But is there any other way out of the GCC Bloat Syndrome?

      -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire                       "*BURRRP!*  Mmm...tastes like cannoli,
St. Petersburg, FL                    smells like garlic!" -Sridhar