Subject: Re: GCC to retire VAX support!?
To: Lord Isildur <mrfusion@uranium.vaxpower.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 06/18/2002 11:04:01
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:41:23PM -0400, Lord Isildur wrote:
> "keep the VAX machine description up to date"?? huh? the VAX hasnt changed
> since the second edition of the VARM came out, like 12 years ago!
The VAX machine description has to change from time to time for a few
reasons:
1. Changes to the middle-end require tweaks to the back-end.
2. Changes to support e.g. PIC code on the VAX (which the
master FSF GCC sources do not support).
> we really should do sufficient adaptation to pcc to a: free it from the
> license, b: make the optimizer as good as gcc's, and c: dig ANSI C as
> well as K&R.
That would be wasted effort. Are you going to add C++ to PCC? Are you
going to add Fortran to PCC? Are you going to make PCC emit debug info
that modern debuggers like to use?
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>