> 
> We finally let it go multiuser, and no corruption has been observed
> over the last few weeks. It's *possible* that a check I added to dz
> some time ago, when I learned it probed in the middle of the feprom,
> has prevented the corruption. We haven't removed the check to test
> this hypothesis, and I'm not even sure if this type of memory is
> vulnerable to a simple write without special gymnastics.
> 
I've added the check here also, even if I haven't been able to
reproduce the problem myself. But as you say, "it don't hurt" :-)

-- Ragge