Anders Magnusson <ragge@ludd.luth.se> wrote:
> I think it would be best to take one of the "reserved for customer use"
> instruction and use it as wait. It would be easy to do and a simple
> patch for the idle loop.

Better using a noop, but still completely unnecessary.  Since SIMH would
need to be changed anyhow, why not fix the problem there and leave NetBSD
alone?