Subject: Re: Process sizes, etc...
To: Anders Magnusson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brian Chase <email@example.com>
Date: 03/11/2002 15:20:32
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> The upt is now sized so that it do not take more than 5% of available
> memory, giving it a reasonable size.
> So, the process size problem should be solved now :-)
Ah, nice. So the sbrk()/mmap() debate never got settled? It's too bad,
as I think it'd be preferable to drop the sbrk() stuff as you suggested.