On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Anders Magnusson wrote:

> The upt is now sized so that it do not take more than 5% of available
> memory, giving it a reasonable size.
>
> So, the process size problem should be solved now :-)

Ah, nice.  So the sbrk()/mmap() debate never got settled?  It's too bad,
as I think it'd be preferable to drop the sbrk() stuff as you suggested.

-brian.