Subject: Re: About the QBus EIDE interface...
To: John Maier <jmaier@midamerica.net>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: port-vax
Date: 01/24/2002 20:20:42
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:15:36AM -0600, John Maier wrote:
> > A better solution is what's already being discussed: an MSCP server on a
> > Qbus card. While I'd personally prefer SCSI to IDE, the ability to put any
> 
> Ummm...Actually SCSI vs. IDE argument goes away, in this case, because:
> 1) Qbus can't even hope to keep up with most any off the shelf EIDE drive made in the last
> few years.
> 2) Using a processor to talk to the IDE, for the VAX, is tantamount to the SCSI
> intelligent controller concept.
> 
> I.e. if I were really bent on it (and I'm not) I could make a controller to which you
> could connect an IDE drive.  On the other side, I could talk out SCSI, then you could hook

Hey, this already exists :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--