On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:

> 	But we should be careful anyway, though. If they see this, and think
> it could generate enough cash for them, they just might whack us. But I
> think we would be safe if we call it an emulator, because it won't be a Vax,
> per se, as they were originally built, right?

Yes. I don't see that there'd be money to be had - it's hardly as if
there's a market there for them, other than us VAXen geeks, and we're not
gonna pay through the nose if they decided to do it anyway.

Personally, I don't see why the Q wouldn't let us do it, but then again,
this is the Q we're dealing with.

I can just see it now tho - a box based on one of these chips, a baby
drive, a bit of RAM, serial and ethernet - and to be able to say you
helped build it from a semiconductor level up. How cool would that be :&)

--Matt

PGP Key fingerprint = 00BF 19FE D5F5 8EAD 2FD5  D102 260E 8BA7 EEE4 8D7F
PGP Key http://knm.yi.org/matt-pgp.html