Subject: Re: TK50 qbus funzies....(:+{{
To: NetBSD Bob <nbsdbob@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
From: Lord Isildur <mrfusion@umbar.vaxpower.org>
List: port-vax
Date: 05/29/2001 11:21:12
ah, welcome to the club! hehehe
a large number of KA650's dont play nice with TK50s. I pulled my hair out
for days trying to figure this one out, going through 3 or 4 TK50
controllers, 4 or 5 drives, and two processors trying to find a
combination that worked. It turns out that most early-rev KA650's have a
problem talking to TK50 controllers. One solution is o use a TK70
controller, though that didn't work for me, the thing that did was to
just use a KA630, as you also discovered. there was some discussion
about this maybe 6 or 7 months ago on the list... check the archives.
happy hacking,
isildur
On Tue, 29 May 2001, NetBSD Bob wrote:
> I was playing around with my BA123 box last night trying to write some
> TK50 tapes, and ran into an interesting problem. The machine had a
> KA650 boardset with 32mb ram. The TK50 would not write reliably at all.
> It would barely read reliably from my master tapes. I pulled the KA650
> boardset and dropped in the original KA630 boardset. The TK50 ran fine.
> Is there something borderline about the quality of a BA123 backplane
> running at 3 vups vs 1 vup? I was wondering why I was having so much
> problem with TK50 tapes lately, and it appears to be bus speed related.
> In the early S100 days, we used passive bus terminator networks to
> calm the bus a 4mhz. I noticed that my 4000/200 has a bus terminator
> card in it. Should the BA123 have such a terminator board in it?
> If so, which board, and where do I find one? Any other suggestions
> about TK50 bus speed related problems?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob
>
>