I have a note that it has a 1KB cache too.
I *believe* that it is the same CVAX chip
that the KA650 used and that does have a 1KB on-chip
cache.

Antonio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saku Setala [mailto:setala@elisa.fi]
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:57 AM
> To: Anders Magnusson
> Cc: port-vax@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: MicroVax 3400 performance with NetBSD 1.5.1_BETA again
>=20
>=20
> Hi Ragge,
>=20
> some documents say that it should have 1K on-chip cache.
>=20
> Anyway, the same document says KA630 is 0.9 VUPS and KA640 is=20
> 2.4 VUPS.
>=20
> Now I get almost similar speed results with dhrystone 1.1, so=20
> there must
> be something funny?
>=20
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Anders Magnusson wrote:
>=20
> > > Hi again,
> > >=20
> > > could it be so that NetBSD does not enable the CPU cache on =
KA640?
> > >=20
> > The KA640 doesn't have a cache, so hopefully NetBSD do not try to
> > turn it on :-)
> >=20
> > -- Ragge
> >=20
>=20
> --
> Saku Set=E4l=E4
> System Planning Manager
> Kolumbus Oy 	http://www.kolumbus.com/
> Elisa Communications Group
>=20