Hi Ragge,

some documents say that it should have 1K on-chip cache.

Anyway, the same document says KA630 is 0.9 VUPS and KA640 is 2.4 VUPS.

Now I get almost similar speed results with dhrystone 1.1, so there must
be something funny?

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Anders Magnusson wrote:

> > Hi again,
> > 
> > could it be so that NetBSD does not enable the CPU cache on KA640?
> > 
> The KA640 doesn't have a cache, so hopefully NetBSD do not try to
> turn it on :-)
> 
> -- Ragge
> 

--
Saku Setälä
System Planning Manager
Kolumbus Oy 	http://www.kolumbus.com/
Elisa Communications Group