actually, since the SHAC is a ci adaptor, shoudlnt it be
ci? at nexus
mscpbus? at ci? node ? 
ra? at mscpbus? 
mt? at mscpbus? 


On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Matt Thomas wrote:

> That's just wrong (IMO).
> 
> mscpbus* at shac? node ?
> ra* at mscpbus? drive ?
> mt* at mscpbus? driver
> 
> Basically, each element on a DSSI bus looks to be equivalent to an HSC
> controller and then a disk and/or tape hangs off the node.  And since DSSI
> speak MSCP, the common MSCP code should be used.

definitely. The mscp code currenlty only talks over the uda driver, but
should also be run over the ci driver.

Isildur