Subject: Re: Earliest VAX port?
To: Anders Magnusson <ragge@ludd.luth.se>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: port-vax
Date: 01/04/2001 10:08:43
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:32:20PM +0100, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> But generally, binaries compiled with gcc was both faster and smaller
> than the corresponding pcc ones.=20
I would believe this.
gcc may be a medium resource pig itself (especially when it gets lost
inside the parser just before giving up and reporting the syntax error),
but the code is not perfect, but still pretty good (on the platforms that
I'm familiar with).
Regards,
Ignatios
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQEVAgUBOlQ9mDCn4om+4LhpAQEW5gf/VRpyBf7SgsViGOSk/E9XT8ie/Pbz8ZbI
vX27YAxL9Wb+2IBTIr8VJUi7KNqVGyAY4Rdsf7mv2Ty1k5iSCxcNGFeoNfOiTZfO
CcRe0vN+eA0mv50cTUNcGL9dw/mdRcqiVox0291NnY/wNO7Cq26Hsb/8VCEMtAq9
Hu4gmplux1HA9Gnixx7odIBw+LbD7pzc1IEKPkuGydsHR3XSge+EUWHQ6ape8mU5
Ew5lvRydFHqGFkKxITP7sw38HAYLmlYFHmLpVnuIk1ERMjmABquAMX1PSByEMtNe
1GMHlXSk6RPNkIY5klvl6LJI/DqHPLtaLHZSrU+0tJRkf4cPfpMiUg==
=vqbn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--