On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Brian Chase wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Greg Ingram wrote:
> 
> > But I have been reading the list and now that I've hauled the VAX over to
> > Mouhamed, I'm back in business.  So, a couple of questions:
> >
> > 1)  Is 1.5 worth trying on a low-memory VAX?  My system:
> >
> > 	MicroVAX II
> > 	realmem = 11526144
> > 	avail mem = 8810496
> > 	Using 140 buffers containing 573440 bytes of memory.
> 
> What?  Since when has 11Megs been considered a low memory VAX? :-) If you
> get down below 8Megs of realmem, maybe you can start claiming to have a
> VAX without much RAM, but 11Megs is still very comfortable.

Er, since the other 8 meg board I'd scrounged doesn't work?  :)  

Seriously though, I don't quite trust that 11 megs, which I'll address
more a response to Chuck.  I guess maybe I should have said
'low-horsepower vax'.

- Greg