--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:53:05PM -0400, NetBSD Bob wrote:
> > Has bit bloat finally set into the VAX port?
>=20
> For fun, I checked some generic kernel sizes for VAX.....
>=20
> 32V                         59528
>=20
> 4.2BSD                     291840
>=20
> 4.3BSD                     407552
>=20
> 4.3BSD-Quasijarus(1999)    484352
>=20
> NetBSD-1.2                      ?
>=20
> NetBSD-1.3                 865218
>=20
> NetBSD-1.4                1015803
>=20
> NetBSD-1.5                1402255
>=20
> Are we bloating a bit around the seams...(:+}}...
>=20
> Yeah, I know, it is only important for MVII critters and odd
> stray 11/730's, but my, how we have grown.....
>=20
> I pine for the light dainty crispness of a 4.3BSD, for example,
> especially on something as slow as an MVII or even an MV3100/10
> kind of box.
>=20
> What is the bloat due to, gccisms?

additional networking protocols, for one. Crypto stuff.

	-is

--=20
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOflSszCn4om+4LhpAQGeSgf9HgI6Yl7dTKhFTPbEqesqpBE+XuSVdFlE
TTnO3CszTCnsR7/PrbCHFjDFB/qVtCZAn2Noyp/rfF2Qqqb4U4fyoBO18Qg0YMvW
SKt92mUf1OuOmIfq7JZrOrqcD24cIrpCGEQZ4Zh0pT/36224cw+MgdWqkJBtY7pA
+6YB6q1O2RNozSpN1PWRek2FoM45cN704W7OgwSt5s5Zgze0CqnAbt1PyJyJVo1j
QbgG16gIkVokBFMPXbpKo76M43QEjx5pBv4wNsl1uM0EzwTRzJg0DJcogv63Gha4
F3DEZ+Hoqo27FYkUf8KVj+eq5ddnBGJt1SRdwlLJsDtnZWgdWwiAzw==
=9ezn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--