Subject: Re: VUP - speediedeamons and the World's Slowest VAX?
To: Dave McGuire <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Kukat <email@example.com>
Date: 02/02/2000 21:50:47
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Dave McGuire wrote:
> >Some of the 4000 series look interesting, and the MicroVAX 3100 9x series.
> >Would they be good things to keep eyes out for?
> 3100m76 is respectable, and runs NetBSD pretty well...and I believe some
> progress was made recently on the 4000/60?
VS 3100m76 and VAX 4000-300 use the same CPU, but DEC sais the m76 has 7,6VUPs,
the 4000-300 has 8VUPs. Don't know if this is a difference in cache, or a
difference in I/O. My personal checks (compiling NetBSD kernel) resulted in
the 4000-300 being slightly slower than the VS 3100m76.
But both are very fine boxes, if you like the QBus, you really should get a
4000-300. 4000-500 port might take some while, the CPU is a bit difficult.
Michael@camaronet.de, Rottweil/Germany, http://www.camaronet.de
Visit the german VAXpage: http://www.vaxpower.de