On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 07:30:26AM -0700, Brian D Chase wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, J.S. Havard wrote:
> 
> > Might not be practical to run due to resource constraints...  Wouldn't
> > happen to be talking aobut emacs by any chance?
> 
> Nah, emacs actually runs pretty well, even on my MicroVAX II.  It takes a
> little while to load -- 15-20 sec, but is quite responsive once loaded.
> The size in memory just after loading is 3212KB, so it's actually pretty
> tight.

Mozilla 4 on an UltraSparc 10 (300 MHz clock) needs a bit less to load.
Only 12 seconds.

And I always wondered why Mozilla5 on a 50 MHz 68060 machine (at home)
needs a whole minute to start up...

Regards,
	-is
-- 
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)