Subject: Re: Don't buy a vax, but the vax (was Re: RIP, VAX)
To: None <port-vax@netBSD.org>
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp@world.std.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 08/28/1999 23:25:02
<>could do a bit of optimization by (say) allowing the next DMA master to
<>arbitrate for the bus while the current transfers are going on...
<
<Yeah, and how about we call this new bus "Unibus"  :-)

And yes to run qbus cards from the new bus we need the qniverter. ;)

<However, I know people hate to hear this but, do you really think a tiny
<company can really build its own VAX CPUs and have them consistantly outper
<software emulators?  It doesn't seem to be happening in the PDP-11 clone

Likely not unless the small company is the size of the ZK0 facility in 
southern NH.  In VAX land OS and CPU are tightly linked and relay on the 
a multitude of device interfaces that are sometime mroe complex than 
the VAX itself.

Allison