On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Matt Thomas wrote:
>An rtVAX was a "modified (read broken)" 78032 (uVAX II CPU) which could run
>VAXELN but not ULTRIX or VMS (due to a change in how user PTEs are mapped).
>NetBSD/vax probably doesn't run on it but it could be changed to do so.
>But I doubt it's work the effort.

  Anyone know how involved this would be?  I respectfully submit that it's
definitely worth the effort, assuming we're not talking about a complete
reimplementation.  Supporting One More Machine can always be of value!

                       -Dave McGuire