Subject: Re: mVAX 3100/40 ??
To: Carl Makin <carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au>
From: Andrew Brennan <brennan@auhs.edu>
List: port-vax
Date: 02/23/1999 19:04:43
Ok ... I believe this is clear enough to me, but nonetheless I would
like the answer to be shiny and crystalline.
<specific density>
A uVAX 3100/40, using a KA45 motherboard/cpu is [a] not going to boot
NetBSD/vax via netboot, [b] not going to boot from tape should I find
some way of putting the OS on a tape and [c] not going to boot should
I manage to wipe a disk and load NetBSD/vax on the drive.
Further, no one has managed to boot NetBSD/vax on a KA45-based system
or it would be documented as "supported" hardware of some type.
</specific density>
If this is the case, is the hardware sufficiently different from most
of the other uVAXen that this isn't going to be easy/possible?
I apologize for needing this beaten into my head, but I'm used to the
feeling that NetBSD will run on anything short of Etch-a-Sketchs (and
I use it on a number of old Macs). Now that I'm thinking I'd run one
of my favorite OSs on the VAXen I have at home (uVAX 3100/40 and also
two VAXstation 4000/vlc systems) I'm discovering that this may not be
as easy as one-two-three. I may have to drag the uVAX II home simply
to have a NetBSD/vax box on the home network. :^)
andrew.
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Carl Makin wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, Anders Magnusson wrote:
>
> > > Is it a MicroVAX 3100/40 or is it a VAXstation 3100/M40 (i.e. VAXstation
> > > 3100/M30 in a taller case). It's actually a MicroVAX 3100/40, then you
> > > won't be able to boot it.
>
> > What's the difference? Except from the box?
>
> Between the M30 and the M40? Nothing. Both use the KA45 motherboard. (I
> have a uVax 3100/M30).
>