> 
> Another thought.. How about dynamic library support?  Wouldn't it be an
> effort saver in the long run to shove dynamic linking into gcc?
> 
Yes, it would be. Feel free to fix it :-) Because there has never been
any vaxen with shared libraries all vax code in GCC needs to be fixed to
support this. I have looked at it but I have felt some other things
more important to do.

-- Ragge