> On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> 
> > From the conversation I had w/ Mouse at the San Jose IETF, he has a[n HP
> > 9000] 320, and yes, it's one of the slowest machines that runs NetBSD; I
> > think the 11/780 is slower, though.
> 
> Well, we also run on the 11/750, which is quite noticably slower
> than a 780. We might even have 11/730 support by now, which would
> probably take the cake pretty easily.

_How_ slow are those three? I just want to mention that NetBSD has been run
on 68020+68881 Amigas, at a clock rate of err... 14 MHz? or 28? Hubert?

Maybe we should run some dhrystone on all of them ;-)


	-is