Subject: Re: SCSI on Q-bus
To: Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net>
From: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
List: port-vax
Date: 02/06/1998 00:06:15
Hmm... Q-bus to ISA bridgeboard anyone? :)
David/absolute
Things to regret not having after transferring 'beans' between two beanbags
#1 : A vacuum cleaner
#2 : A floor the same colour as the beans
#3 : More beans
On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Jacob Suter wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just make some low cost PC-style
> hardware that plugs into qbus, etc... It'd be cool to see what a
> halfway modern video processor (S3, ATI Mach64, etc) and decent SCSI
> and/or IDE.
>
> Hey, maybe even multiple graphics/keyboard/mouse consoles on faster
> machines.... With today's microelectronics the sky is the limit.
>
> JS
>
>
> David Evans wrote:
> >
> > Brian D Chase wrote:
> > >
> > > But if we can do IDE, then maybe we can consider
> > > moving on to bigger and better things like SCSI... or hell, maybe even a
> > > new ethernet device... Or a SCSI/IDE/ethernet combo controller... Or how
> > > about a simple graphics board that we can actually code a driver for, and
> > > that would drive a standard SVGA monitor :-)
> > >
> >
> > I think we need PCMCIA hardware. It would be best on a 9000, of course.
> >
> > --
> > David Evans (NeXTMail/MIME OK) dfevans@bbcr.uwaterloo.ca
> > Computer/Synth Junkie http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~dfevans/
> > University of Waterloo "Default is the value selected by the composer
> > Ontario, Canada overridden by your command." - Roland TR-707 Manual
>