Subject: Re: SCSI on Q-bus
To: David Evans <dfevans@bbcr.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Jacob Suter <jsuter@intrastar.net>
List: port-vax
Date: 02/06/1998 01:09:13
Wouldn't it be a lot simpler to just make some low cost PC-style
hardware that plugs into qbus, etc...  It'd be cool to see what a
halfway modern video processor (S3, ATI Mach64, etc) and decent SCSI
and/or IDE.  

Hey, maybe even multiple graphics/keyboard/mouse consoles on faster
machines....  With today's microelectronics the sky is the limit.

JS


David Evans wrote:
> 
> Brian D Chase wrote:
> >
> > But if we can do IDE, then maybe we can consider
> > moving on to bigger and better things like SCSI... or hell, maybe even a
> > new ethernet device... Or a SCSI/IDE/ethernet combo controller... Or how
> > about a simple graphics board that we can actually code a driver for, and
> > that would drive a standard SVGA monitor :-)
> >
> 
>   I think we need PCMCIA hardware.  It would be best on a 9000, of course.
> 
> --
> David Evans          (NeXTMail/MIME OK)             dfevans@bbcr.uwaterloo.ca
> Computer/Synth Junkie                      http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~dfevans/
> University of Waterloo         "Default is the value selected by the composer
> Ontario, Canada           overridden by your command." - Roland TR-707 Manual